Reddit user s2upid has performed a teardown on a HoloLens 2 and revealed the MicroVision MEMS Laser Scanning display modules inside.
As a little bit of background... In April 2017, Microsoft needed to create a generational performance leap for the new HoloLens. To achieve this, Microsoft undertook a development contract with a small technology company, and bet that the small company's unique display system, called MEMS Laser Scanning, could enable radical performance gains for the next generation HoloLens. Happily, the April 2017 development contract and the display that came from it was so successful that MEMS Laser Scanning was referred to as a "miracle" by Alex Kipmanin this CNET article from the HoloLens 2 product launch in February 2019.
The scope of the market opportunity made possible by this technology is well understood by Microsoft. While accepting aSmithsonian Ingenuity Awardfor inventing the HoloLens 2, Kipman stated “I have no doubt that devices like this are going to be the pervasive way of interacting with technology. It's kind of inevitable. It feels obvious.” Indeed, since the launch of HoloLens 2 in Barcelona at Mobile World Congress 2019, Microsoft has continually touted the capabilities of the HoloLens 2 MEMS Laser Scanning display, in interviews, tweets, and articles, describing its unique benefits such as wider field of view, smaller size and lower weight and power versus conventional fixed-pixel displays such as LCOS -- and continually claimed sole credit for its invention. In reality, the MEMS Laser Scanning display technology inside the HoloLens 2 is the invention and intellectual property of MicroVision (MVIS), Microsoft's partner and neighbor across town in Redmond, WA. MicroVision developed the display system for HoloLens 2 by leveraging their pioneering technology, IP and system engineering expertise in MEMS Laser Scanning, built over many years and at over $500 million in development costs. At the same time that Microsoft was assuming sole credit in the media and with the public for the invention of the HoloLens 2 MEMS Laser Scanning display, it bound MicroVision through an NDA to disallow MicroVision from mentioning the customer, the end product or even the market vertical in which its technology is used.
Microsoft's HoloLens 2 media campaign created the perception in the public's mind that MicroVision did not have anything to do with enabling the world's leading Mixed Reality product. This false perception has hurt the value of MicroVision and hampered its ability to raise operating capital, leading to negative effects to the company, its employees and shareholders.
MicroVision is now a proven development partner, supplier and licensor to Microsoft, making HoloLens 2, and the larger Mixed Reality market opportunity possible. Now that the product is in the public domain and has been torn down to reveal the MicroVision MEMS Laser Scanning display modules inside, it's time for Microsoft to give credit where it is due and publicly acknowledge the essential contributions of MicroVision's patented technology to the HoloLens 2 product and to Microsoft's Mixed Reality strategy.
Yes, Microsoft must acknowledge Microvision's contribution given their employee's misstatement last week that Microsoft owns all the IP in Hololens 2. Clearly, given this proof, that statement was false.
why did they agree to sign unbelievably one-sided NDA in the first place? Did they have terrible negotiating/legal team? Lack of confidence in their product/abilities?
This blog is the author's personal website. It is not affiliated with MicroVision, Inc. or any company. This website does not recommend the purchase or sale of any stocks, options, bonds or any investment of any kind. This website does not provide investment advice. Disclaimer and Notices: Disclaimer: This website may contain "forward-looking" information including statements concerning the company's outlook for the future, as well as other statements of beliefs, future plans and strategies or anticipated events, and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. The forward-looking information and statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the statements. The information on this website includes forward looking statements, including statements regarding projections of future operations, product applications, development and production, future benefits of contractual arrangements, growth in demand, as well as statements containing words like believe, estimate, expect, anticipate, target, plan, will, could, would, and other similar expressions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance. Actual results could differ materially from the results implied or expressed in the forward looking statement. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward looking statements are included in MVIS most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the heading 'Risk factors related to the company's business,' and our other reports filed with the Comission from time to time. Except as expressly required by Federal securities laws, MVIS Blog undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in circumstances, or other reasons. Legal Notice: Although considerable care has been taken in preparing and maintaining the information and material contained on this website, MVIS Blog makes no representation nor gives any warranty as to the currency, completeness, accuracy or correctness of any of the elements contained herein. Facts and information contained in the website are believed to be accurate at the time of posting. However, information may be superseded by subsequent disclosure, and changes may be made at any time without prior notice. MVIS Blog shall not be responsible for, or liable in respect of, any damage, direct or indirect, or of any nature whatsoever, resulting from the use of the information contained herein. While the information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. MVIS Blog has not independently verified the facts, assumptions, and estimates contained on this website. Accordingly, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to, and no reliance should be placed on the fairness, accuracy, or completeness of the information and opinions contained on this website. Consequently, MVIS Blog assumes no liability for the accompanying information, which is being provided to you solely for evaluation and general information. This website does not contain inside information, proprietary or confidential information learned or disclosed as part of employment relationships or under nondisclosure agreements or otherwise.
Happily, the April 2017 development contract and the display that came from it was so successful that MEMS Laser Scanning was referred to as a "miracle" by Alex Kipman in this CNET article from the HoloLens 2 product launch in February 2019. 
Indeed, since the launch of HoloLens 2 in Barcelona at Mobile World Congress 2019, Microsoft has continually touted the capabilities of the HoloLens 2 MEMS Laser Scanning display, in interviews, tweets, and articles, describing its unique benefits such as wider field of view, smaller size and lower weight and power versus conventional fixed-pixel displays such as LCOS -- and continually claimed sole credit for its invention. 
At the same time that Microsoft was assuming sole credit in the media and with the public for the invention of the HoloLens 2 MEMS Laser Scanning display, it bound MicroVision through an NDA to disallow MicroVision from mentioning the customer, the end product or even the market vertical in which its technology is used.
Yes, Microsoft must acknowledge Microvision's contribution given their employee's misstatement last week that Microsoft owns all the IP in Hololens 2. Clearly, given this proof, that statement was false.
ReplyDeletehttps://old.reddit.com/r/MVIS/comments/gilxpj/microsoft_needs_to_immediately_issue_a_correction/
Thanks for your sacrifice
ReplyDeletewhy did they agree to sign unbelievably one-sided NDA in the first place? Did they have terrible negotiating/legal team? Lack of confidence in their product/abilities?
ReplyDeletegood q for today's shareholder meeting
Delete