Computer visionary Ray Kurzweil examined the effects of accelerating growth of technologies on the present and future of human technological innovation during a speech at the ninth annual CRN Industry Hall of Fame, held Tuesday in Santa Clara, Calif.
Much of Kurzweil's speech centered around how innovation is driving the engines of technological and economic growth. For example, adoption of e-commerce has followed a smooth exponential growth curve, despite the lower levels of online activity that characterized the dot-com downturn. "Generally, the 'boom and bust' psychology is a true harbinger of what will ultimately be a true revolution," said Kurzweil.
With regard to how solution providers use technology to tackle everyday business tasks, Kurzweil explained why he feels it's necessary to make predictions and models for the future. "It's very important to track technological trends. People assume the technology will be essentially the same in five years, but contemplating what things will be like--that's why we model for the future," said Kurzweil.
The bulk of human intelligence is pattern recognition, which Kurzweil said is the quintessential example of a self-organizing system. This will be instrumental in the development of future Web-based applications, he added. For example, he said that Google has developed a speech tool for English-Arabic and Arabic-English translation, despite the fact that no one on the development team spoke Arabic. "I think this type of feature will be a standard feature on mobile phones by the next decade," he said, giving a demonstration of the tool.
As proof that these types of evolutions will take place, Kurzweil used the example of artificial intelligence that is embedded everywhere in today's society, from medical devices such as electrocardiogram machines and credit card fraud detection software. "If these narrow [artificial intelligence] programs suddenly stopped working, it would cripple the economic infrastructure," he said.
By 2010, Kurzweil said, computers will begin to disappear, instead becoming embedded in the environment and into materials such as clothing and eyeglasses. Images will be written directly on human retinas, said Kurzweil, adding that the military uses this technology today in modeling virtual reality environments. "Search engines of the near future won't wait to be asked for information," he said.
"2029 is where technology really gets interesting because we'll have had all of this exponential growth taking place over the next 25 years," said Kurzweil. By this time, computation will move from the device and become Web-centric. "There is going to be a worldwide mesh consisting of tiny devices, nodes in clothing and in the environment, each sending and receiving their own messages, as well as passing on other peoples' messages," Kurzweil said. Organization on the massive worldwide mesh will be much like that of the traditional Internet, in terms of being self-organizing and every device being a node, he added.
Driving this worldwide mesh will be exponentially speedier bandwidth, according to Kurzweil. Most important of all will be not the devices, but the software that will be designed to harness this exponentially increased power of the network, he said.
I think it would be interesting for you to take into consideration a certain technology 'divide' in the emerging internet and citizens access to it, and especially in your articles.
All the things Kurzweil and others are predicting may be true, but there is a footnote that should be added to any such ponderings, which is that, if correct, they will apply only to those who choose (and/or who can afford) to participate. In other words, as these technologies develop, there will emerge two distinctly separate 'realities:' a carbon based one, and a silicon (or other) based one.
Many people will remain in the former for many, many years to come, either because they can't afford access, because the personal ROI isn't there, or becasue it's just too creepy.
Of course, some of the more ubiquitous aspects of culture (bank accounts, credit cards, etc), will increasingly require some level of 'new-world' tech participation, but I think it will be a long, long, time before these kinds of predictions are anywhere close to ubiquitous.
Also, the 'ghost in the machine' factor will become increasingly important. Take the gargantuan blunder by Sony last week, in it's embedded DRM 'intelligence'. Imagine something analogous happening with a widespread medical technology (which is becoming more and more likely, with the increasing privatization of the medical and bio-tech industries). There would be such a drop in patient trust that you'd have people in droves demanding older medical technologies: perhaps in the same way that more educated, and health-conscious people demand foods that are free of technologies such as GMO, or RBST dairy, for example.
This blog is the author's personal website. It is not affiliated with MicroVision, Inc. or any company. This website does not recommend the purchase or sale of any stocks, options, bonds or any investment of any kind. This website does not provide investment advice. Disclaimer and Notices: Disclaimer: This website may contain "forward-looking" information including statements concerning the company's outlook for the future, as well as other statements of beliefs, future plans and strategies or anticipated events, and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. The forward-looking information and statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the statements. The information on this website includes forward looking statements, including statements regarding projections of future operations, product applications, development and production, future benefits of contractual arrangements, growth in demand, as well as statements containing words like believe, estimate, expect, anticipate, target, plan, will, could, would, and other similar expressions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance. Actual results could differ materially from the results implied or expressed in the forward looking statement. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward looking statements are included in MVIS most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the heading 'Risk factors related to the company's business,' and our other reports filed with the Comission from time to time. Except as expressly required by Federal securities laws, MVIS Blog undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in circumstances, or other reasons. Legal Notice: Although considerable care has been taken in preparing and maintaining the information and material contained on this website, MVIS Blog makes no representation nor gives any warranty as to the currency, completeness, accuracy or correctness of any of the elements contained herein. Facts and information contained in the website are believed to be accurate at the time of posting. However, information may be superseded by subsequent disclosure, and changes may be made at any time without prior notice. MVIS Blog shall not be responsible for, or liable in respect of, any damage, direct or indirect, or of any nature whatsoever, resulting from the use of the information contained herein. While the information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. MVIS Blog has not independently verified the facts, assumptions, and estimates contained on this website. Accordingly, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to, and no reliance should be placed on the fairness, accuracy, or completeness of the information and opinions contained on this website. Consequently, MVIS Blog assumes no liability for the accompanying information, which is being provided to you solely for evaluation and general information. This website does not contain inside information, proprietary or confidential information learned or disclosed as part of employment relationships or under nondisclosure agreements or otherwise.
Mr Ben,
ReplyDeleteI think it would be interesting for you to take into consideration a certain technology 'divide' in the emerging internet and citizens access to it, and especially in your articles.
All the things Kurzweil and others are predicting may be true, but there is a footnote that should be added to any such ponderings, which is that, if correct, they will apply only to those who choose (and/or who can afford) to participate. In other words, as these technologies develop, there will emerge two distinctly separate 'realities:' a carbon based one, and a silicon (or other) based one.
Many people will remain in the former for many, many years to come, either because they can't afford access, because the personal ROI isn't there, or becasue it's just too creepy.
Of course, some of the more ubiquitous aspects of culture (bank accounts, credit cards, etc), will increasingly require some level of 'new-world' tech participation, but I think it will be a long, long, time before these kinds of predictions are anywhere close to ubiquitous.
Also, the 'ghost in the machine' factor will become increasingly important. Take the gargantuan blunder by Sony last week, in it's embedded DRM 'intelligence'. Imagine something analogous happening with a widespread medical technology (which is becoming more and more likely, with the increasing privatization of the medical and bio-tech industries). There would be such a drop in patient trust that you'd have people in droves demanding older medical technologies: perhaps in the same way that more educated, and health-conscious people demand foods that are free of technologies such as GMO, or RBST dairy, for example.
Keep up the good work!
Wow, great comment!
ReplyDeleteThere's a lot to think over here. Let me kind of absorb this and feed back to you. Thanks for writing.